Voice from the South

Our culture

By FR. EMETERIO BARCELON, SJ
October 2, 2009, 12:00pm
Corporate culture came upon me as a surprise. In Benguet Management a manager explained that they dismissed a fellow because he received a bribe. “That is against our culture here in Benguet.” I did not know that they were conscious of a culture of integrity or any culture at all. It was the first time I heard someone use the word culture with respect to operation in a corporation. Culture is the value system of an organization and therefore present in any corporation but normally not consciously aware of it. In this corporation they were conscious of their value of integrity as a value the people of the organization maintained. How do you create a desired culture and how do you maintain it? Culture comes naturally but guiding it to an optimal system is something else. There is a culture in every organization but has it been guided to a desired system. When we hear “values” we presume good positive values. But there are detrimental values as well, like sloppiness, tolerance of dishonesty, proclivity to violence, etc. Is the culture in our organization what we want it to be?

Culture is also applied to national culture, namely the value system of the nation and the normal tendency of the people’s behavior. The Bushido culture of Japan promoted honesty, hard work, shame for failure in the leaders. A leader would rather slit his belly and die rather than live in shame of having caused problems to the community. The Filipino culture is less exacting nor as violent. There is bravery to the death, so we have many war heroes. Filipino culture is more tolerant and forgiving of wrongdoing. The Filipino can be expected to help those suffering or are weak. He will help the stranger but prefers not to get involved in problems that surface around him. The tendency is to decry the rapacity of politicians but forgiving of personal offense and/or forgetful of sins committed against the community.

Culture is a system of values often subconscious that guides a group’s behavior. It consists not only of good values but also of detrimental values, like vestiges of the revenge syndrome in the “rido” of Muslim areas, less prominent in the Christian areas but still existing there. It may be a human weakness that we instinctively find satisfaction in revenge. We seek to save face. We don’t want to “mapahiya.” Our “maratabat” or “pagkalalaki,” ego or pride is still present. Some say that we have a damaged culture. What does that mean? If it means that there are scoundrels among us and corrupt politicians. We have to accept. So have other nations except that we focus on them so much that we forget we have the 99 percent who seek the common good, welfare of all, especially the revenge syndrome in the “rido” of Muslim areas, less prominent in the Christian areas but still existing there. It may be a human weakness that we instinctively find satisfaction in revenge. We seek to save face. We don’t want to “mapahiya.” Our “maratabat” or “pagkalalaki,” ego or pride is still present. Some say that we have a damaged culture. What does that mean? If it means that there are scoundrels among us and corrupt politicians. We have to accept. So have other nations except that we focus on them so much that we forget we have the 99 percent who seek the common good, welfare of all, especially the poor. Do we focus on them because corruption is so alien to our aspirations? Does our poverty produce the crooked politicians or do the bad politicians produce the poverty in our land? We have a culture of kindness and mercy, a culture of happiness (mababaw ang kaligayahan), a culture of individuality that even induces disunity. We have a culture of industriousness though it constantly seeks for approval or reward. We have a culture that can be the envy of others. We only have to focus on the neglected good traits of our people. Can we try to improve our culture?<emeterio_barcelon@yahoo.com>