Be fair
MANILA, Philippines — Identify other religious groups that received financial aid.
This was the challenge of the Catholic Church to the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office (PCSO) amid the issue on the “Pajero Bishops.”
Tandag Bishop Nereo Odchimar, president of the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP), said if the state-owned lottery agency really wants to name all their beneficiaries then they should also include other religious groups and not just single out the Catholic Church.
“There are beneficiaries also not coming from the Catholic Church. Other people are asking why pinpoint on the Catholic bishops? Is it because some of the bishops are critical? Is it because of the position of the bishops on the Reproductive Health (RH) bill?” he told reporters in an interview.
But Malacañang said the Aquino government is not singling out the Catholic Church.
Deputy Presidential Spokesperson Abigail Valte said that it just so happened that the Commission on Audit (CoA) report for 2008 and 2009 had detected donations to some bishops. The same CoA report did not mention any other religious denomination, Valte added.
“It’s not something personal, it’s just that the 2008 and 2009 COA report itself stated that the money should not have been disbursed in that manner because it is violative of the constitutional prohibition,” Valte said in an interview over government radio dzRB.
Former CBCP president and Davao Archbishop Fernando Capalla also echoed what Odchimar said.
“If there’s malice in those donations to Catholic bishops, the PCSO must also identify all the other recipients from other Churches,” he said in an article posted on the CBCP website.
“I don’t know why they take it just on Catholic bishops and make it appear as scandalous,” added Capalla.
The Davao prelate said he is saddened over the “unfair” treatment of PCSO to bishops on the issue when the agency’s donations to Catholic institutions were used for relief efforts and social programs on poverty alleviation and health.
“This is unfair. I challenged them to show the records, the real records and not the twisted ones,” Capalla said.
“They must have some reason for doing it. I don’t know what it is but they are really giving us priests a bad image,” added the prelate.
Earlier, PCSO Chairman Margarita Juico said former President and now Pampanga Rep. Gloria Macapagal Arroyo used the agency’s funds for political patronage.
Arroyo, she said, had also given vehicles to some bishops and priests at that time when she was facing a threat of removal from office due to allegations of corruptions.
The PCSO said the agency’s former board approved the grant of SUVs to Cotabato Archbishop Orlando Quevedo, Butuan Bishop Juan de Dios Pueblos, Msgr. Augusto Laban of Sorsogon, and Fr. Roger Lood of Iligan City.
The request of Lood was reportedly coursed through Archbishop Capalla, who endorsed the letter to Arroyo in 2009.
Capalla said he did endorse Lood’s proposed project for possible funding, “but I didn’t know if it was approved or not.”
He admitted telling Lood to ask for assistance from PCSO because “it is a charitable institution and helping the poor.”
His endorsement of Lood’s proposed project, said Capalla, may have been the reason his name came out in the SUV issue.
Iligan Bishop already said that Lood never received any vehicle from the PCSO and that the priest failed to get any support for his project.
Quevedo and Pueblos also denied receiving vehicle from PCSO.
Basilan Bishop Martin Jumoad, another prelate implicated in the controversy admitted receiving P1.1 million from the PCSO for the purchase of a vehicle.
“This vehicle is what we are using in our medical and relief operations,” he said over Church-run Radyo Veritas.
“But if they want to get it, if P-Noy wants to get it, it’s ready. We can return it to them,” added Jumoad.
In the said radio interview, the Basilan prelate also gave President Aquino this piece of advice.
“It is very difficult to govern a nation when we are divided. We have to cooperate and collaborate. And at the same time we have to work together and dialogue. If you do not listen to us. And if you only listen to those who will always praise you then we will never move on,” Jumoad said.
Valte said it is up to the PCSO to decide on their next action over the anomaly that they had uncovered.
The Palace official, however, reminded Catholic bishops that they are not above the law should criminal cases are filed against them over the donations they had received from the government,
“Certainly if it’s a criminal offense, nobody is above the law and nobody is immune from suit,” Valte said.
She stressed that the 1987 Constitution states that “no public money or property shall be appropriated, applied, paid or employed, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, sectarian institution, or system of religion, or of any priest, preacher, minister, other religious teacher, or dignitary as such, except when such priest, preacher, minister or dignitary is assigned to the Armed Forces or to any penal institution or government orphanage or leprosarium.”




Comments
hello to all the readers of manila bulletin. i just wanna say something to all the leaders of any religious group that you are there to spread the good news of the LORD and not to receive anything whether be it in kind or in cash coz its not good for the public to see coz they might think that you are accepting bribe from public officials. so stick to ur role and not accept any donations to any public officials coz remember this, the fund that they use to buy or the cash that they give you comes from the publics fund which is the taxes that the public is paying.
A Fil-am was driving 80mph (way over the limit) in a California higway. When pulled over by a highway patrol cop, the Fil-Am said "officer, what about that other guy who was running faster than me". To which the cop replied, "don't worry, we will also get him"
This is typical Pinoy response kapag nahuli. Bakit sila hindi nahuli, ako lang ang hinuli.
Tapusin muna natin itong kabalbalan ng CBCP. Tapos hahabulin din natin yung iba. Hindi sila abswelto dahil may iba din nanalasa ng salapi ng bayan
its not just scandalous its also against the law, there is no problem if somebody gave donation to the church as long as it is his own money not the government money.. if the bishop doesnt know the law on it but ignorance of the law excuses no one... if they are really true christian by faith dpt tngagapin nila n labag sa batas ang gnwa nila and be hunble enough to apologize nde yung dami p nilang alibi at nanddamay p cla nkkahiya sa imahe ng smbhan
bishop capella is missing the point,he said that the vehicles donated is for relief efforts and social programs on poverty alleviation and health.come on!, pajero?,luxury car for relief effort???the 1987 constitution prohibit this donation.,u must follow the rule of law.
NAKAKAHIYA KAYO...KAYO MGA IKAR TALAGA ANG HARLOT. GO TO HELL!!!!
These churchmen have become thickfaced and hypocitical at the highest level. Instead of owning up to violating the constitution in accepting gifts from the PCSO, they are saying "hindi lang naman kami, ah". It would have been best if they just confess their sins and reform so that they can salvage what is left of their credibility.
Anong kinalaman ng IBA sa usapin? Ang isyu ay yong pagtanggap ng HATAG, hindi yong kung sinupaman ang nakinabang sa bubwit. Pagpalagay na nating isang laksang libo ang nakinabang din sa mga hand-outs, mababago pa ba yong nangyaring pagtanggap ng HATAG, solicited or otherwise. Hindi ba narinig ng mga kina-uukulang bishop$ ang salitang DELICADEZA?
Bakit kailangan pang maghanap ng dahilan o rationalizations? Kulang pa ba yong pagpapatunay na tumanggap ang mga kina-uukulan ng HATAG? "Bakit kami lang, noh? Marami pang iba dyan, noh..... sila din imbistigahan ninyo, noh."
Ha ha ha....bata batuta, 'sang perang muta!
Anong kinalaman ng IBA sa usapin? Ang isyu ay yong pagtanggap ng HATAG, hindi yong kung sinupaman ang nakinabang sa bubwit. Pagpalagay na nating isang laksang libo ang nakinabang din sa mga hand-outs, mababago pa ba yong nangyaring pagtanggap ng HATAG, solicited or otherwise. Hindi ba narinig ng mga kina-uukulang bishop$ ang salitang DELICADEZA?
Bakit kailangan pang maghanap ng dahilan o rationalizations? Kulang pa ba yong pagpapatunay na tumanggap ang mga kina-uukulan ng HATAG? "Bakit kami lang, noh? Marami pang iba dyan, noh..... sila din imbistigahan ninyo, noh."
Ha ha ha....bata batuta, 'sang perang muta!
Anong kinalaman ng IBA sa usapin? Ang isyu ay yong pagtanggap ng HATAG, hindi yong kung sinupaman ang nakinabang sa bubwit. Pagpalagayna nating isang laksang libo ang nakinabang din sa mga hand-outs, mababago pa ba yong pagtanggap ng HATAG, solicited or otherwise. Hindi ba narinig ng mga kinauukulang bishop$ ang salitang DELICADEZA?
Ano ang hinahanap ninyo PO, dahilan o rationalizations? "Hoy, hindi lang kami, noh.....marami pang iba, noh"
Please login or register to post comments.