The Commission on Human Rights (CHR) has expressed "grave concern" over the discussions  to include the regulation of social media in the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR) of the Anti-Terrorism Act.

CHR spokesperson Atty. Jacqueline Ann de Guia said in a statement that the proposal is vague, and it is an overreach in terms of guaranteeing the right to privacy and right of individuals to freely express their ideas.

"The threat of restraint posed by the inclusion of a provision to regulate social media may constitute a bar for individuals to continue voicing out their opinions and ideas, curtailing fundamental freedoms," she said.

"Furthermore, as there is nothing in the law that allows for the regulation of social media, to push for the inclusion of such questionable provision would go beyond the legislative intent of the law, justifying instead the fears of the people already against the law," added De Guia.

The CHR stressed that a free democratic society accepts and welcomes the free exchange of ideas. When people have the freedom of expression which enables them to speak their truth and convictions, the CHR said there will be better accountability in government.

The Commission reminded the government and its officials that should there be any redress for wrongdoing, those who dished out legitimate dissent and honest opinions must not be targeted.

"At times when the discourse is critical and may seem discomforting, let critical points be taken in with an eye towards improvement," encouraged De Guia. "As development and nation-building is a collective effort, let us remember that the protection of fundamental freedoms are important to ensure that all voices are heard."

She added that the protection of freedom of expression is not about protecting people's sensibilities from criticism. Rather, it is about protecting the individual's right to speak freely without fear -- with the end goal of securing a better future for all people.